|
|
How do I gain staff support?Hi all, I am hoping I can draw on your combined expertise to help me solve a problem I am facing… I am working to gain commitment from my school's leadership for a whole school approach to HoM. The Principal class are supportive, however there is one particular, pivotal, leading teacher who is opposing the idea. Her main reason for blocking is that she sees the concepts of HoM as "stuff we already do" and a "package" that will just be an add on and the "latest thing". I am aiming to bring about a paradigm shift to help her see that although a lot of the stuff in HoM is what we already do, the notion of a common language and explicit focus will be totally beneficial, and rather than an add on, will underpin everything we do, both from a curriculum and student welfare perspective. The school is entering a new charter period, with all the change attached to it, and it is important that I gain her support and that HoM is seen not as another layer of change to be heaped on top, but more accurately as the threads that bind our goals and foci together into a cohesive and powerful approach to learning! If you have had a similar experience that you might share, or any tips you might offer me… I would love to hear from you. KEEP LEARNING Daniel Gooding
ResponsesHello Daniel I certainly empathize with your problem. One thing that I will be doing to develop some interest in HOM within my cluster is to relate it to the BLUEPRINT. It is my understanding that the blueprint's "Essential Skills" contains 3 components. Knowledge, Generic Skills and Social competencies. I think HOM has the potential to directly address the last two components and consequently also improve the acquisition of knowledge. Your blocker may of course see "generic skills" and "social competencies" as an add on and things that you already do also. If she is right your school must be leading the way. The fear/skepticism of add ons is a real and valid one. As you have suggested the key is to try and integrate things like HOM into what you already do or have to do as a vehicle to make things more cohesive not more complicated. The BLUEPRINT stuff might be the catalyst to do this. Regards Graeme Henchel
Hello Daniel, I can sympathize with your position. When presenting Habits to staff, I have continually stressed two arguments for taking them up within the school, 1. Shared language/common approach 2. 'Essential skills' I noticed that Graeme in a recent email outlines linking the Blueprint to Habits, and it is a powerful argument. I have found that many staff were happy to engage with the material when they realized it was seen as a key part of learning and of our school's commitment to the future direction of teaching. With resistant teachers, I feel the reticence can be seen as an extension of the debate over who defines what constitutes teaching and learning in the school. Conventional wisdom would suggest that leadership should provide the direction, while the staff body work together on the definition. Having the Principal class, the Department's Blueprint and some leading teachers on board seems to indicate that the direction for your school is reasonably clear - the direction and preferred definition of what constitutes teaching and learning seem to support the implementation of Habits. The challenge is of course to get everyone moving in the same direction and with the same purpose. I believe that if the majority of staff can come to share a similar definition of what teaching and learning is, then the development of a common language and a shared approach seems the next logical step. Habits is ideal for developing the common language and the shared approach. Your resistant teacher seems to be using the old line of saying '"it is stuff we are already doing". In some ways, she is correct as much of the work can relate directly to best practice already happening in schools. But is she using the same language as everyone else when she is teaching? Is her vision of learning the same as everyone else's? Convincing all members of staff that it is worthwhile to follow the path along implementation of the Habits is potentially the biggest challenge facing those trying to kick start the process in schools. If the Habits can be made to be powerful for the many, it will hopefully entice the few who resist to join in. From there, I suppose that the next big challenge will be to ensure that work in this area does not just become another fad or what once was 'the latest thing', but rather part of a redefining of what it means to teach and learn. Must be Friday. Hope my rant helps, and good luck. regards, Richard Owens
Dear Daniel,
Dear
Art, Southvale Primary School |
|
Reference: Icons and Habit descriptions Reprinted by Permission. The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development is an international education association for educators at all levels and of all subject matter, dedicated to the success of all learners. To learn more, visit ASCD at www.ascd.org |